I've been using Windows Vista for a couple of weeks now and although I have found some redeeming qualities about the upgrade, I'm still not sold on it by a long shot. One confusing issue for me is the massive amount of computing power that will be required to run the software. And that's not just me and thousands of others saying that, Microsoft will tell you straight up how crappy your computer is with their "Windows Experience Index" score. The score breaks down how your processor, memory, graphics card, and hard drive all handle the massive Vista system by assigning each a score.
The score can be from a 1 (lowest score) to 5.9 (highest score). The higher the score, the better Windows will perform. The overall score is derived not by an average of all the scores, but by taking the lowest score. Microsoft is hoping that software companies will adopt this score to list on their boxes to help with minimum requirements. If the box says that it requires a 2.4 Windows score to run it and you only have a 1.8, you don't buy the software. Hmmm, will 1) Users know how to find this score, 2) All companies adopt this method (thus hurting sales), and 3) Do hardware makers want their hardware critiqued like this? I think the answer to all the questions will probably be "no".
My score of 1.0 listed above is on a machine with a 2.8 ghz Penitum 4 with 768 megabytes of RAM and 80 GB hard drive. The graphics card is on-board with RAM shared from the system. Basically an above average computer for the last couple of years and yet the score is the lowest possible. To make my score rise, I could add RAM and a graphics card ($200 or less for the two). It would probably raise my score to a 3 or 4.
What do you think of this Windows Index Scrore? Have you heard about it? Do you think it is a good idea or bad idea and why?
Related articles:
- Don’t buy a new computer yet
- Why haven’t software companies adapted to Vista yet?
- Is your computer ready for Windows Vista? Do you care?
- Buy now or wait?
- Windows Vista Preview Demonstration – October 2006
Tags: hard drive, Mac, Microsoft, upgrade, Windows
















HelpMeRick.com started as a monthly tip site for beginners in 1996, and now supports our popular call-in computer show, and hosts thousands of useful computer tips and links.
I’ll be using W2000 for a long time. I find it to be very stable and rock solid. Why upgrade?
I’ve been using windows since version 3.1 (MS_DOS before that) and when it gets to the point where a high power PC is required just to run the operating system then it’s time to start looking at a MAC or switch to Linux.
inbuilt obsolescence is the name of the money making game,
avoid vista, int exp 7 crashes and is slow
ever feel like a guinea pig?
keep up the show!
buy apple stok .I got a 1.0 on a new 64 bit .oink oink
won’t use if it takes up so many resources you have to buy a high end computer! How stupid is that?