<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows XP Rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://helpmerick.com/windows-xp-rumors.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://helpmerick.com/windows-xp-rumors.htm</link>
	<description>Easy to understand computer help</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:15:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/windows-xp-rumors.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/?p=2777#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>I just read about Locate 32 a couple of months ago...does it work pretty fast?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read about Locate 32 a couple of months ago&#8230;does it work pretty fast?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/windows-xp-rumors.htm/comment-page-1#comment-7342</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 02:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/?p=2777#comment-7342</guid>
		<description>Locate 32 has find as you type, instant find capability in XP so why do I need anything Vista has that can do less?

Vista is bloated, crappy, &amp; harder to use (has a thrown together look, compared to XP)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Locate 32 has find as you type, instant find capability in XP so why do I need anything Vista has that can do less?</p>
<p>Vista is bloated, crappy, &amp; harder to use (has a thrown together look, compared to XP)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/windows-xp-rumors.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6096</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/?p=2777#comment-6096</guid>
		<description>Good point...besides the slick integrated search, I don&#039;t see any major improvements in Vista. Upcoming Windows 7 does improve upon Vista, but as you say, who needs it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point&#8230;besides the slick integrated search, I don&#8217;t see any major improvements in Vista. Upcoming Windows 7 does improve upon Vista, but as you say, who needs it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Cameron</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/windows-xp-rumors.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6049</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 00:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/?p=2777#comment-6049</guid>
		<description>No big surprise here.  Microsoft is in business to make money.  Not make quality software that works.  It took me two years to find something that Vista does that XP does not that is actually worthwhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No big surprise here.  Microsoft is in business to make money.  Not make quality software that works.  It took me two years to find something that Vista does that XP does not that is actually worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: helpmerick.com @ 2012-02-09 17:49:12 -->
