<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet another feature yanked from the NEW Microsoft Office 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm</link>
	<description>Easy to understand computer help</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:54:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-1#comment-4417</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-4417</guid>
		<description>I have built an addon that puts a new button in the Insert ribbon tab:
Just extract it to some folder and run setup:

http://rapidshare.com/files/219462848/WordScannerAddin.rar</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have built an addon that puts a new button in the Insert ribbon tab:<br />
Just extract it to some folder and run setup:</p>
<p><a href="http://rapidshare.com/files/219462848/WordScannerAddin.rar" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.com/files/219462848/WordScannerAddin.rar</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-#comment-3126</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-3126</guid>
		<description>and it only took me 15 minutes to figure out to click on the pretty icon in the top left corner .....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and it only took me 15 minutes to figure out to click on the pretty icon in the top left corner &#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-#comment-3127</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-3127</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt; It&#039;s introduced &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06wwln-medium-t.html?ex=1357275600&amp;en=e0f04d9791fe6b3a&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all&quot;&gt;in this Washington Times Editorial&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; It looks very nice.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kevin
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It&#8217;s introduced <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/06/magazine/06wwln-medium-t.html?ex=1357275600&amp;en=e0f04d9791fe6b3a&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all">in this Washington Times Editorial</a>.
</p>
<p> It looks very nice.
</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-#comment-3128</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-3128</guid>
		<description>Microsoft likes to call that button the &quot;Office Orb...just like the changed they Start button in Vista to the &quot;Windows Orb&quot;. 8 years and billions in R&amp;D went into those orbs that decreased all of our productivity!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft likes to call that button the &#8220;Office Orb&#8230;just like the changed they Start button in Vista to the &#8220;Windows Orb&#8221;. 8 years and billions in R&#038;D went into those orbs that decreased all of our productivity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-#comment-3129</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-3129</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kevin for the link to the article. Looks like a very interesting application!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kevin for the link to the article. Looks like a very interesting application!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-#comment-3130</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-3130</guid>
		<description>It was an absolutely pointless feature - get over yourself. Boo hoo, so you had to copy them from your computer first. Just look over the rest of the features offered in the application and you will see what a bloody good job microsoft has done for once.

An why on Earth was this the first time you were familiarise yourself with the industry standard in word processing over a year since its release? If you are offering advice on the technology you should have known what features were removed and understand why they were. A line had to be drawn somewhere regarding how many features there are in an application and how large the files will be. Office is HUMUNGOUS as it is - and for good reason - with all the new features there had to be some slack put into the system somewhere.

I am thoroughly disappointed in your ignorance as a proffesional in the field. Brand new product? It&#039;s a year and 2 months old; practically stoneage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was an absolutely pointless feature &#8211; get over yourself. Boo hoo, so you had to copy them from your computer first. Just look over the rest of the features offered in the application and you will see what a bloody good job microsoft has done for once.</p>
<p>An why on Earth was this the first time you were familiarise yourself with the industry standard in word processing over a year since its release? If you are offering advice on the technology you should have known what features were removed and understand why they were. A line had to be drawn somewhere regarding how many features there are in an application and how large the files will be. Office is HUMUNGOUS as it is &#8211; and for good reason &#8211; with all the new features there had to be some slack put into the system somewhere.</p>
<p>I am thoroughly disappointed in your ignorance as a proffesional in the field. Brand new product? It&#8217;s a year and 2 months old; practically stoneage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-#comment-3131</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-3131</guid>
		<description>Tho I do use office 2k7, I sure am glad I didnt pay for it. Not worth the money when there are many free/better alternatives</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tho I do use office 2k7, I sure am glad I didnt pay for it. Not worth the money when there are many free/better alternatives</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-#comment-3132</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-3132</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I love it when they change something that everyone is completely familiar with like the &quot;File&quot; button to a meaningless icon just for the hell of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I love it when they change something that everyone is completely familiar with like the &#8220;File&#8221; button to a meaningless icon just for the hell of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-#comment-3133</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-3133</guid>
		<description>What industry are you in?  First, OOXML or Ecma is A standard but not THE INDUSTRY standard.  Big difference.  Second, many people/organizations do NOT support OOXML document standards, this only screams that Office 2007 as a whole is not an industry standard, and that, in fact, it is the previous versions of office that are standard.  Just because its Microsoft doesn&#039;t make it standard.

I am thoroughly disappointed in[sic] your ignorance as a &quot;Smart Computer User&quot;.  As a computer ENGINEER (I may not be smart I&#039;ll admit) but I&#039;ll tell you two things, first, 1 year is NOT stone age for software, it takes many years before things become standard.  Second if it makes life more difficult for the user, it was a poor design decision by the Software Engineers.  Kudos for being wrong on all counts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What industry are you in?  First, OOXML or Ecma is A standard but not THE INDUSTRY standard.  Big difference.  Second, many people/organizations do NOT support OOXML document standards, this only screams that Office 2007 as a whole is not an industry standard, and that, in fact, it is the previous versions of office that are standard.  Just because its Microsoft doesn&#8217;t make it standard.</p>
<p>I am thoroughly disappointed in[sic] your ignorance as a &#8220;Smart Computer User&#8221;.  As a computer ENGINEER (I may not be smart I&#8217;ll admit) but I&#8217;ll tell you two things, first, 1 year is NOT stone age for software, it takes many years before things become standard.  Second if it makes life more difficult for the user, it was a poor design decision by the Software Engineers.  Kudos for being wrong on all counts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://helpmerick.com/yet-another-feature-yanked-from-the-new-microsoft-office-2007.htm/comment-page-#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://helpmerick.com/wordpr/?p=2052#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>snip &lt; Just look over the rest of the features offered in the application and you will see what a bloody good job microsoft has done for once. &gt; snip

Just what are those features??
We, as an office, have switched back to 2003 and one of the main reasons was &quot;insert picture from scanner&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>snip < Just look over the rest of the features offered in the application and you will see what a bloody good job microsoft has done for once. > snip</p>
<p>Just what are those features??<br />
We, as an office, have switched back to 2003 and one of the main reasons was &#8220;insert picture from scanner&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
